Rules in Cyberspace: Preventing International Conflicts
international cyberspace

Damage from a cyber attack is by nature transnational, and cannot be managed successfully from one country.


“In little more than a generation, the Internet has become the substrate of the global economy and governance worldwide, but such interdependence implies vulnerabilities,”

Joseph S. Nye outlines (“International norms in cyberspace” -Project Syndicate-). Cyber threats include: cyber war, economic espionage largely associated with states, cyber crime and cyber terrorism, which are mostly associated with non-state actors.

All are extremely costly and harmful. International cooperation is necessary, although Russia and China are trying to impose Internet censorship. “Major states should reach agreements in order to limit damage,” Nye urges (PS).

Nonetheless, “China is a central player in cyber-warfare,” according to John Bolton (“Obama’s cyber silence leaves U.S. unprepared” -Los Angeles Times-). “China is the likely culprit and its cyberwar- fare is part of a deeply troubling pattern. Another problem is Obama’s sustained inaction,” Bolton emphasizes. Beijing sees penetrating US government computers as a military capability.

US retaliation must include implementing political and economic measures that go well beyond simply inflicting pain on China’s computer networks (LA Times).

Javier Solana sees cyberspace as an “infrastructure on which nearly all economic activities have come to depend, although asymmetric attacks take place because the barriers to cyberspace are inconsequential and governments have struggled to enforce the rule of law online,” (“Cyber War and Peace” -Project Syndicate-).

Damage from a cyber attack is by nature transnational, and cannot be managed successfully from just one jurisdiction. While regarding the technical aspects there is a public-private approach, the US, China and Russia have not agreed on a treaty to harmonize national laws or facilitate cooperation, partly due to mutual mistrust, which has caused nations to revert to defending their own interests.

“Responding to twenty first century threats with twentieth-century tools is a bad idea. The world needs a dialogue among states, the private sector and civil society in order to guarantee collective progress,” Solana concludes (PS).

Next- The Google Case: Abuse of Market Dominance or European Protectionism? 


2022 Trends: What’s Changing in Commercial Real Estate 

2022 Trends: What’s Changing in Commercial Real Estate 

What will you do differently in the second quarter to jump on these trends? Let's call a spade a spade—most of the real estate industry took a major blow in 2020 and early 2021. But the market is changing rapidly and in ways we never could have predicted in our...

What Exactly Is the Creator Economy?

What Exactly Is the Creator Economy?

Its growth can be attributed to five global changes Would you believe it is the fastest-growing small business sector in the world? It’s very likely that you haven’t heard this new term, but you have already participated in it—if you bought something from a shop on...


Sign Up for the Latin Biz Today Newsletter

Video Gallery

PR Newswire

Featured Authors





What Are You Really Selling?

What Are You Really Selling?

Are you missing out on sales because you are selling the wrong thing? I walked up to the counter at my favorite local coffee shop. The young girl behind the counter with a beaming smile, looks me in the eye and says. “How are you doing today?” At first I was taken...






14 Takeaways From the World of Sports Business

14 Takeaways From the World of Sports Business

Check out these quick snapshots across the sports industry in May 2022 Welcome! Well, I am apparently over my anger about the baseball lockout. Yes, I am following the game to a degree, especially because the Mets are off to a good start. The New York Yankees are also...


Work, Life & Culture


Health & Fitness

Travel & Destinations

Personal Blogs

Latin Business Today

Pin It on Pinterest